Differences Between MOPA Laser Marking Machines and Traditional Fiber Laser Marking Machines
1. Introduction
In the field of laser marking, MOPA laser marking machines and traditional fiber laser marking machines are two common types of equipment. Although both are based on fiber laser technology, they exhibit significant differences in terms of working principles, performance characteristics, and application scenarios. This article will provide a detailed comparison of the differences between these two types of laser marking machines to assist users in selecting the most suitable equipment for their specific needs.
2. Working Principle
- Traditional fiber laser marking machines: Utilize Q-switching technology to generate pulsed light output by periodically increasing or decreasing optical loss within the resonant cavity. Their pulse width is typically fixed between 80 ns and 140 ns and is difficult to adjust.
- MOPA laser marking machine: Utilizes Master Oscillator Power Amplifier (MOPA) technology, where the pulse seed light signal is generated by a semiconductor laser chip driven by an electrical pulse. Its pulse width can be freely adjusted between 2 ns and 500 ns, offering greater flexibility.
III. Pulse Parameter Control
- Traditional fiber laser marking machine: The pulse width is fixed and cannot be adjusted according to material and processing requirements. The pulse frequency range is generally between 1.6 kHz and 100 kHz.
- MOPA laser marking machine: The pulse width and repetition rate are independently controllable, enabling more precise marking effects. Its pulse width can be adjusted within the range of 2 ns to 500 ns, and the repetition frequency range is 20 kHz to 80 kHz.
4. Marking Effect
- Traditional fiber laser marking machines: Suitable for marking most metal and non-metal materials, but with limited effectiveness on some special materials (such as anodized aluminum, plastic, etc.). The marking edges may be rough, and the heat-affected zone is relatively large.
- MOPA laser marking machine: Capable of achieving more precise marking results, particularly excelling in special applications such as colored marking on stainless steel, black marking on anodized aluminum, and marking on plastics. The marking edges are smoother, and the heat-affected zone is smaller.
5. Applicable Materials
- Traditional fiber laser marking machine: Suitable for marking various metals (such as stainless steel, aluminum alloy, copper, etc.) and non-metallic materials (such as plastics, glass, etc.).
- MOPA Laser Marking Machine: In addition to the materials suitable for traditional fiber laser marking machines, it is particularly suitable for heat-sensitive materials (such as plastics, glass, etc.) and materials requiring high-contrast marking (such as anodized aluminum, stainless steel, etc.).
6. Cost and Maintenance
- Traditional Fiber Laser Marking Machine: Relatively simple structure, more cost-effective. Lower maintenance costs, suitable for users with limited budgets.
- MOPA laser marking machine: Due to its complex internal structure and higher technical requirements, the equipment cost and maintenance costs are relatively higher. However, its high precision and versatility make it more cost-effective for some high-end applications.
7. Application Scenarios
- Traditional fiber laser marking machine: Widely used in fields such as electronic components, mechanical parts, medical devices, and food and beverage packaging.
- MOPA laser marking machines: In addition to the above fields, they are particularly suitable for industries with high requirements for marking precision and effects, such as high-end electronics manufacturing, semiconductors, jewelry, and handicrafts/gifts.
8. Summary
MOPA laser marking machines and traditional fiber laser marking machines have significant differences in terms of working principles, pulse parameter control, marking effects, applicable materials, costs and maintenance, and application scenarios. Traditional fiber laser marking machines, with their simple and cost-effective characteristics, are suitable for most conventional material marking needs; MOPA laser marking machines, however, leverage their flexible pulse parameter control and high-precision marking effects to demonstrate unique advantages in special materials and high-end applications. When selecting a laser marking machine, users should consider their specific needs, budget, and application scenarios, comprehensively evaluating the performance and cost of the equipment to make the most suitable choice.
.
.
Previous page: What industries commonly use green laser marking machines? Next page: Main Components of a Laser Marking Machine
CO₂ Laser Marking Machine: How to Calibrate the Galvanometer for Drift
How does laser marking software call database variables?
Achieving Unlimited Rotation with Slip Rings in Laser Marking Machines
Controlling the Thermal Affect Zone on Plastics with MOPA Laser Marking Machine
Engraving Insulation Lines on Metallized PET Film with Green Laser Marking Machine
Laser Marking of Aluminum Alloys: Challenges and Solutions
Achieving Internal Invisible Codes on Transparent Epoxy Resin with MOPA Laser Marking Machine
Precise Centering with Rotary Axes in Laser Marking Machines
Addressing Reflectivity Challenges with Handheld Laser Marking Machines on Copper Workpieces
Differences Between MOPA Laser Marking Machines and Traditional Fiber Laser Marking Machines
Main Components of a Laser Marking Machine
Introduction to “Cold Processing” Laser Marking
How to choose the type of laser marking machine based on the material?
Is there a significant difference between 20W and 50W fiber laser marking machines?
The Purpose of Adding a Rotary Axis to a Laser Marking Machine
Core Parameters to Consider When Purchasing a Laser Marking Machine
How is the scanning area of a laser marking machine determined?
What are the cooling methods for laser marking machines? Which one is better?
What size of worktable surface does a laser marking machine need?
Can a laser marking machine be equipped with a vision positioning system?